Prediction of Cindy Burger vs Natela Dzalamidze Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Burger vs N. Dzalamidze

Cindy Burger

NED

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'6" (1.70m)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

134

Best Rank

245

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$44.2K

Career Money

$2.9K

Right-Handed

Plays

Natela Dzalamidze

GEO

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'6" (1.70m)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

134

Best Rank

245

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$44.2K

Career Money

$2.9K

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Burger 1 - 1 Dzalamidze

They have played 6 sets in total, with Cindy Burger winning 3 and Natela Dzalamidze winning 3. The last match between Cindy Burger and Natela Dzalamidze was at the Cairns, 05-10-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Cindy Burger getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Burger	1
Dzalamidze	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(QF) Cairns(10-05-15)

Stats

Cindy Burger

Natela Dzalamidze

(SF) Navi Mumbai(12-15-14)

Stats

Natela Dzalamidze

Cindy Burger

C. Burger vs N. Dzalamidze H2H Profile

C. Burger	Stats	N. Dzalamidze
$44,173	Career Prize Money	$2,896
58.66% (325-229)	Career Total W/L	59.35% (200-137)
1	Hard	1
7	Titles	10
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Burger vs N. Dzalamidze Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cindy Burger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Natela Dzalamidze has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cindy Burger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Natela Dzalamidze has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cindy Burger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Natela Dzalamidze has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cindy Burger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Natela Dzalamidze winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cindy Burger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 283/180), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/3). Natela Dzalamidze has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 104/56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 17/17).
Player level: In the last year, Cindy Burger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Natela Dzalamidze has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cindy Burger winning 1 times and Natela Dzalamidze being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Cindy Burger winning 3 and Natela Dzalamidze winning 3.
The last match between Cindy Burger and Natela Dzalamidze was at the Cairns, 05-10-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Cindy Burger getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:30.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Cindy Burger and Natela Dzalamidze have played a deciding set 2 times, with Cindy Burger winning 1 times and Natela Dzalamidze 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cindy Burger has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Natela Dzalamidze has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cindy Burger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Natela Dzalamidze has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cindy Burger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Natela Dzalamidze has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cindy Burger vs Natela Dzalamidze Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Burger vs N. Dzalamidze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Burger	Stats	N. Dzalamidze
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	3
31	Games Won	27
0	Aces (Total)	2
3	Total Double Faults	3
1:3:30	Average Match Time	1:3:30
70% (57/82)	1st Serve %	54% (43/80)
65% (37/57)	1st Serve Win %	58% (25/43)
28% (7/25)	2nd Serve Win %	38% (14/37)
54% (7/13)	Break Pts Won %	55% (6/11)
51% (41/80)	Return Points Win %	46% (38/82)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	100% (1/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Burger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W25 The Hague - 28-06-2021
Q1 Demi TranD. Tran	L	w/o	Stats
W15 Alkmaar - 21-06-2021
R2 Natalia SzabaninN. Szabanin	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Sinja KrausS. Kraus	W	7-6(1) 6-1	Stats
W25 Frydek Mistek - 14-09-2020
QF Raluca Georgiana SerbanR. Georgiana	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
R2 Jesika MaleckovaJ. Maleckova	W	7-6(1) 7-5	Stats

View All

N. Dzalamidze Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W25 Oeiras - 19-04-2021
Q1 Sina HerrmannS. Herrmann	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
W15 Sharm El Sheikh - 26-10-2020
Q1 Katarina KuzmovaK. Kuzmova	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
W25 Moscow - 24-02-2020
Q3 Daria KruzhkovaD. Kruzhkova	L	7-6(5) 6-1	Stats
Q1 Martyna KubkaM. Kubka	W	4-6 6-4 10-5	Stats
W25 Kazan - 20-01-2020
Q1 Ekaterina KazionovaE. Kazionova	L	7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Burger vs N. Dzalamidze Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Burger	Stats	N. Dzalamidze
58.66% (325/229)	YTD Win/Loss	59.35% (200/137)
58.03% (737/533)	Sets Win/Loss	58.64% (448/316)
53.74% (6273/5400)	Games Win/Loss	53.97% (3682/3140)
51.92% (27/25)	Hard Win/Loss	65.00% (104/56)
61.12% (283/180)	Clay Win/Loss	54.69% (70/58)
40.00% (14/21)	Indoor Hard W/L	52.38% (22/20)
25.00% (1/3)	Grass Win/Loss	57.14% (4/3)
0.08	Aces Per Game	0.07
432	Aces Total	249
0.2	Double Faults Per Game	0.11
1116	Total Double Faults	351
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
177.41	Average Opponent Rank	623.42
56% (9662/17288)	1st Serve %	56% (2981/5330)
63% (6060/9662)	1st Serve Win %	64% (1898/2981)
44% (3346/7626)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (1021/2349)
49% (1155/2345)	Break Points Won % (Total)	46% (297/645)
48% (8292/17235)	Return Points Win %	45% (2447/5488)
18.18% (2/9)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
48.39% (15/16)	Main Tour W/L	33.33% (2/4)
57.41% (186/138)	Challenger W/L	49.16% (88/91)
64.89% (122/66)	Futures W/L	72.37% (110/42)
59% (322/542)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (195/332)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
45% (54/119)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (22/42)
50% (86/173)	Deciding Set Win %	43% (42/97)
84% (331/277)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (210/179)
16% (331/52)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (210/31)
22% (221/48)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (125/19)